I often think that we undervalue slack and mind-wandering. I often think of this brilliant quote from Amos Tversky in The Undoing Project: "The secret to doing good research is always to be a little underemployed. You waste years by not being able to waste hours.”
I work in academia -- as a creative writer I'm not sure I can say "I am an academic"! :) -- and I've had one sabbatical and am looking forward to my next! I also watch all my colleagues rotate through them, and I have to say, they are essential -- whenever someone publishes a book or succeeds in a major project, they credit the sabbatical. People also tend to return from sabbatical FAR more pleasant to be around! Lol. I'm sure there are some personality types sabbaticals would frustrate (lack of routine, no externally-defined measurements of success, etc), but the kind of people who gravitate towards academia are really self-motivated self-over-workers who are creative but prone to burnout. Where I work the deal is one semester at full pay or a full year at 70% pay, which I consider very reasonable, since the University gets to take some credit for everything we accomplish, but some people accomplish things and then move on, so it strikes a balance. For me the key to a successful sabbatical is the complete shift in thinking -- on my last sabbatical I actually TOOK UP a bunch of new hobbies that had nothing to do with my work, but it was a different kind of challenge, different-dimensional thinking. For my next sabbatical I'm planning to spend a year abroad teaching English -- that's still work, but it's a total change of perspective with new challenges. Do I think my creative work benefits from this, even when I am doing my regular work of teaching and admin duties? Oh Hell Yes. Without the breaks I'd be so completely burnt out, and, I suspect, VERY unpleasant and grouchy! Ha!! :)
The more we strive to optimize everything, the more we squander and silently collectively condemn what is not immediately measurable.
Of course, there is a lot of self-censoring when it comes to not taking sabbaticals as well. I have the sense that the people you had as examples here, would have a healthy detachment from their work. To not have it be an integral part of their identity. They certainly didn't have an executive saying to them “hey we are family here”.
As a 33 year old who’s chosen to drop out of life for the past year and wander the world in search of my next challenge, I very much appreciate the case study here. I think it’s a huge loss to humanity that people don’t understand the value of being temporarily retired during mid life. It gives you perspective and distance to start to understand what the rest of your career might optimally look like, as opposed to suffering from myopia always just staring at the next rung of the ladder.
I created my own sort of Sabbatical 13 years ago. I handled it poorly and, on the brink of making risk work, I faltered. It derailed my life in good and bad ways. I know that in the time I spent going for it and being free, I was as happy as I had been my entire life.
This is part of the question also. Clearly it's hard to do it well straight off, especially if it goes bad for any number of reasons. But the fact that if has to be fought for makes it a victory condition, rather than a regular condition.
Sabbaticals only free you up to do lots of thinking if you don't have kids or your spouse is the primary caregiver.
The one person who took a "break" after her Ph.D. to take care of her kids managed to do well after going back to work did so in spite of having kids, not because of the "break."
Loved the post Rohit. There are many subthemese which should be explored further. Indeed I think the most useful function of MBA is as a very costly sabbatical (except in India if you are a 23 year old in IIMA right after IIT - it exhausts me to even think about it). Anyway, don't take sabbaticals if you work in big Pharma. I correctly did not take my six month paternity leave, correctly assuming that if not there during the reorganisation, will definitely get screwed, the social media posts not withstanding.
Oh interesting, pharma isn't a good place for it? My exposure is limited there but a few (female) friends who were there loved it because of maternity leave policies
Really well written. I think academia is still best suited to offer sabbaticals, but is no longer carrying its weight in attracting or holding onto talent that is best suited to take those sabbaticals.
I love this--I think of course of Russel's In Praise of Idleness and the Idler Manifesto (which led to a Professionalized Idler magazine, of course.)
You argue for the value of the Sabbatical in instrumental terms. That it increases creativity. Helps us do other things. But the real purpose of the Sabbatical is ideally... to do nothing structured. To potentially sit and stare at the ocean all day. The harder argument is to argue that we should do the Sabbaticlal even if nothing useful occurs from it. Just because it's nice.
Practically, I wonder if such a Sabbatical is feasible today. With the demands on our attention--phones, games, TV, schedules can you really get the silence and the freedom necessary for a true break? (Probably why we imagine a lot of 'breaks' as trips away physically--to get away practically from the distractions) Maybe a more radical act of renunciation is necessary?
> But the real purpose of the Sabbatical is ideally... to do nothing structured. To potentially sit and stare at the ocean all day. The harder argument is to argue that we should do the Sabbaticlal even if nothing useful occurs from it. Just because it's nice.
I completely agree. Though the argument is primarily instrumental in aggregate, it only works if it's undirected at the individual level.
Rest is also a form of resistance where we testify to the truth that the end of human living isn’t economic productivity. It’s good to be restored for more work but that need not be the only or primary purpose of rest.
came here through erik's post and totally agree with all of this.
the need for long rests like these is so critical. and while most would not normally consider something like a PhD to foster this kind of rest, i'd argue that it is its original intention. to think deeply over a long period of time about a very specific topic. I say this because i feel like my time in grad school was restful and transformative in this kind of way. especially in figuring out a way to prioritize that kind of daily restfulness that can help lead to consistent breakthroughs. none of this restfulness/free time is available in an average academic's life anymore. they're burdened by teaching and emails and managing too many students and all the committees they have to serve on. it's a damn shame and academic progress is slowing as a result.
i don't know how we can get around to fixing it without substantial legislation. i myself am trying to work on enabling folks to engage more mindfully with their computers and thereby disengage more effectively from their technology to try to foster more daily rest.
Thank you! And "none of this restfulness/free time is available in an average academic's life anymore" I agree, it's a symptom of a much larger problem.
indeed. michael hudson talks about it in a variety of places as a symptom of the financialization of universties but mentions it in this podcast episode: https://youtu.be/1q8wgMQjDFI
Oct 4, 2023·edited Oct 4, 2023Liked by Rohit Krishnan
I recommend getting a part time job. Maybe 20 Hours a week and then periodically do side projects in which you reach 40 hours a week. Very few people know that you can survive very well on 20 hours pay a week. There are so many purchases which are unnecessary. EDIT: Maybe not everywhere in the world. Here in Germany the cost of living is quite good
Really our entire culture around work needs a complete overhaul - not to mention the economic conditions that allow employers to lock in workers for fear of their livelihood and survival, trapping them into the nonstop grind that makes a simple idea like a sabbatical seem an impossible privilege! Imagine actually having time for self-development - let alone something that helps others - and it’s that out of reach for most people!
Yes. While there's a lot of conversation around continuous learning in practice it seems like an impossible goal to be only completed in nights and weekends.
I often think that we undervalue slack and mind-wandering. I often think of this brilliant quote from Amos Tversky in The Undoing Project: "The secret to doing good research is always to be a little underemployed. You waste years by not being able to waste hours.”
Had forgotten that line, so good!
My edit function is playing up, so apologies for the repetition of often think.
I work in academia -- as a creative writer I'm not sure I can say "I am an academic"! :) -- and I've had one sabbatical and am looking forward to my next! I also watch all my colleagues rotate through them, and I have to say, they are essential -- whenever someone publishes a book or succeeds in a major project, they credit the sabbatical. People also tend to return from sabbatical FAR more pleasant to be around! Lol. I'm sure there are some personality types sabbaticals would frustrate (lack of routine, no externally-defined measurements of success, etc), but the kind of people who gravitate towards academia are really self-motivated self-over-workers who are creative but prone to burnout. Where I work the deal is one semester at full pay or a full year at 70% pay, which I consider very reasonable, since the University gets to take some credit for everything we accomplish, but some people accomplish things and then move on, so it strikes a balance. For me the key to a successful sabbatical is the complete shift in thinking -- on my last sabbatical I actually TOOK UP a bunch of new hobbies that had nothing to do with my work, but it was a different kind of challenge, different-dimensional thinking. For my next sabbatical I'm planning to spend a year abroad teaching English -- that's still work, but it's a total change of perspective with new challenges. Do I think my creative work benefits from this, even when I am doing my regular work of teaching and admin duties? Oh Hell Yes. Without the breaks I'd be so completely burnt out, and, I suspect, VERY unpleasant and grouchy! Ha!! :)
Haha that sounds like exactly the right mix! Can I join :-)
The more we strive to optimize everything, the more we squander and silently collectively condemn what is not immediately measurable.
Of course, there is a lot of self-censoring when it comes to not taking sabbaticals as well. I have the sense that the people you had as examples here, would have a healthy detachment from their work. To not have it be an integral part of their identity. They certainly didn't have an executive saying to them “hey we are family here”.
As a 33 year old who’s chosen to drop out of life for the past year and wander the world in search of my next challenge, I very much appreciate the case study here. I think it’s a huge loss to humanity that people don’t understand the value of being temporarily retired during mid life. It gives you perspective and distance to start to understand what the rest of your career might optimally look like, as opposed to suffering from myopia always just staring at the next rung of the ladder.
I created my own sort of Sabbatical 13 years ago. I handled it poorly and, on the brink of making risk work, I faltered. It derailed my life in good and bad ways. I know that in the time I spent going for it and being free, I was as happy as I had been my entire life.
This is part of the question also. Clearly it's hard to do it well straight off, especially if it goes bad for any number of reasons. But the fact that if has to be fought for makes it a victory condition, rather than a regular condition.
Excellent!
Thank you sir!
It's like the missing chapter from my book
Ok that's a rather incredible compliment and while I love my essay I'm not sure that's true.
That said, if it's useful, steal it!
I might be able to quote it---final revisions coming soon!
Sabbaticals only free you up to do lots of thinking if you don't have kids or your spouse is the primary caregiver.
The one person who took a "break" after her Ph.D. to take care of her kids managed to do well after going back to work did so in spite of having kids, not because of the "break."
Basically a load of confirmation bias.
Loved the post Rohit. There are many subthemese which should be explored further. Indeed I think the most useful function of MBA is as a very costly sabbatical (except in India if you are a 23 year old in IIMA right after IIT - it exhausts me to even think about it). Anyway, don't take sabbaticals if you work in big Pharma. I correctly did not take my six month paternity leave, correctly assuming that if not there during the reorganisation, will definitely get screwed, the social media posts not withstanding.
Oh interesting, pharma isn't a good place for it? My exposure is limited there but a few (female) friends who were there loved it because of maternity leave policies
Really well written. I think academia is still best suited to offer sabbaticals, but is no longer carrying its weight in attracting or holding onto talent that is best suited to take those sabbaticals.
Thanks you for the kind words! Yes, I do find it sad. I'm genetically predisposed to finding academia amazing, and find it frustrating when it isn't.
I love this--I think of course of Russel's In Praise of Idleness and the Idler Manifesto (which led to a Professionalized Idler magazine, of course.)
You argue for the value of the Sabbatical in instrumental terms. That it increases creativity. Helps us do other things. But the real purpose of the Sabbatical is ideally... to do nothing structured. To potentially sit and stare at the ocean all day. The harder argument is to argue that we should do the Sabbaticlal even if nothing useful occurs from it. Just because it's nice.
Practically, I wonder if such a Sabbatical is feasible today. With the demands on our attention--phones, games, TV, schedules can you really get the silence and the freedom necessary for a true break? (Probably why we imagine a lot of 'breaks' as trips away physically--to get away practically from the distractions) Maybe a more radical act of renunciation is necessary?
> But the real purpose of the Sabbatical is ideally... to do nothing structured. To potentially sit and stare at the ocean all day. The harder argument is to argue that we should do the Sabbaticlal even if nothing useful occurs from it. Just because it's nice.
I completely agree. Though the argument is primarily instrumental in aggregate, it only works if it's undirected at the individual level.
Rest is also a form of resistance where we testify to the truth that the end of human living isn’t economic productivity. It’s good to be restored for more work but that need not be the only or primary purpose of rest.
By the way, where did your page break symbol come from? It#'s cool, but also looks AI
Made it a while back from AI I think and cropped to the right size
came here through erik's post and totally agree with all of this.
the need for long rests like these is so critical. and while most would not normally consider something like a PhD to foster this kind of rest, i'd argue that it is its original intention. to think deeply over a long period of time about a very specific topic. I say this because i feel like my time in grad school was restful and transformative in this kind of way. especially in figuring out a way to prioritize that kind of daily restfulness that can help lead to consistent breakthroughs. none of this restfulness/free time is available in an average academic's life anymore. they're burdened by teaching and emails and managing too many students and all the committees they have to serve on. it's a damn shame and academic progress is slowing as a result.
i don't know how we can get around to fixing it without substantial legislation. i myself am trying to work on enabling folks to engage more mindfully with their computers and thereby disengage more effectively from their technology to try to foster more daily rest.
anyway, lovely work!
Thank you! And "none of this restfulness/free time is available in an average academic's life anymore" I agree, it's a symptom of a much larger problem.
indeed. michael hudson talks about it in a variety of places as a symptom of the financialization of universties but mentions it in this podcast episode: https://youtu.be/1q8wgMQjDFI
I recommend getting a part time job. Maybe 20 Hours a week and then periodically do side projects in which you reach 40 hours a week. Very few people know that you can survive very well on 20 hours pay a week. There are so many purchases which are unnecessary. EDIT: Maybe not everywhere in the world. Here in Germany the cost of living is quite good
Really our entire culture around work needs a complete overhaul - not to mention the economic conditions that allow employers to lock in workers for fear of their livelihood and survival, trapping them into the nonstop grind that makes a simple idea like a sabbatical seem an impossible privilege! Imagine actually having time for self-development - let alone something that helps others - and it’s that out of reach for most people!
Yes. While there's a lot of conversation around continuous learning in practice it seems like an impossible goal to be only completed in nights and weekends.
Awesome read